Christian Fiction Scavenger Hunt! ~ Stop #9

Christian Fiction Scavenger Hunt! ~ Stop #9

Christian Fiction Scavenger Hunt Stop #9


Welcome to the Christian Fiction Scavenger Hunt! If you’ve just discovered the hunt, be sure to start at Stop #1, and collect the clues through all 33 stops, in order, so you can enter to win one of our top 3 grand prizes!

•    The hunt BEGINS with Stop #1 at Lisa Bergren’s site.
•    The hunt is BEST VIEWED using Chrome or Firefox as your browser (not Explorer)
•    It is open to INTERNATIONAL entrants.
•    PRIZES include 3 sets of all 32 books, $500 in Amazon gift cards and many authors are offering additional prizes!
•    There is NO RUSH to complete this hunt—you have ALL WEEKEND. So take your time, reading the unique posts along the way; our hope is that you discover new authors/new books you might want to learn more about!
•    Submit your ENTRY for the GRAND PRIZE at Stop #33 (back on Lisa’s site) by Monday night (4/25) at midnight mountain time.

~*~

Now that you know how it works, let’s get down to business!

I’m thrilled to be hosting the amazing Angela Hunt — I’m sure you’ve seen some of her many books around. I have several on my shelf, and I always know to listen up when she chimes in on one of the email groups we both belong to. 😉 So now without further ado . . .

Angela Hunt

 Everyone wants to be beautiful . . . or do they?

You may remember the Seinfeld episode where Jerry is dating a super-model. This girl gets away with everything! When Jerry gets pulled over by a traffic cop, he lets his girlfriend do all the talking . . . and doesn’t get a ticket. Apparently, beautiful people get away with crimes, never have to pay for their meals, and never have to stand in line. They get all kinds of positive attention because other people like to look at perfection . . .

But history has demonstrated that beauty can sometimes be downright dangerous. It was to explore this aspect of beauty that I wrote what I jokingly call the “Bible Babes” series—books on Esther, Bathsheba, and Delilah. Esther was so beautiful that she was taken from her devout Jewish family and placed in a pagan king’s harem—trust me, that wasn’t like winning a beauty pageant. Bathsheba was so beautiful that she was raped by a king, then had to remain quiet while the king murdered her husband and her firstborn baby died. And Delilah, for reasons only she knows, used her beauty as a weapon, destroying a man of God and setting into motion a war between the Hebrews and the Philistines.

Even mythology points out the dangerous side of beauty. Helen, wife to a Greek king, is kidnapped by Paris, a prince of Troy, and a war is waged to recover the beautiful queen. “The face that launched a thousand ships” resulted in the loss of thousands of lives, or so the story goes.

If beauty is so dangerous, why do women spend so much time, money, and energy on trying to be beautiful? I ask myself that every time I sit down to tame the wild mane that lives on my head.

I believe something within us yearns for beauty—not only on our bodies, but in our homes—because we crave it. God is beautiful, his creation is beautiful, and something in us naturally hungers after beauty. We fix ourselves up because we want to please our husbands, our children, and our God. We are, after all, daughters of the King.

But God is not silent on the subject of beauty: “Don’t be concerned about the outward beauty of fancy hairstyles, expensive jewelry, or beautiful clothes. You should clothe yourselves instead with the beauty that comes from within, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is so precious to God.” (1 Peter 3:3-4).

The Lord, the Mighty One, is God,
    and he has spoken;
he has summoned all humanity
    from where the sun rises to where it sets.
From Mount Zion, the perfection of beauty,
    God shines in glorious radiance. –Psalm 50:1-2.

Ah—there’s the crux of the matter. While there’s nothing wrong with being beautiful, the most precious beauty is cultivated within. Because beauty is from God, and of God.

Dr. Angela Hunt has written over 130 books for adults and children. She
has recently completed her second doctorate in theology and taken up
photography as a second career.

~*~
Here’s the Stop #9 Skinny:

You can order Angela’s book on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, CBD or at your local bookstore!

Clue to Write Down: of fiction

Stop #10: Angela Hunt’s site

Lost? Here’s the list of all the links in the hunt.

~*~

Extra Giveaway

In addition to the big prize you’re going for, I’m also offering a giveaway of a set of my books. If the winner is a US address, she’ll receive the Ladies of the Manor Series books 1 and 2, The Lost Heiress and The Reluctant Duchess. If the winner is international, I’m offering a complete digital set of my biblical fiction, A Stray Drop of Blood, A Soft Breath of Wind, and Jewel of Persia (winner’s choice of mobi for Kindle, epub, or PDF).

a Rafflecopter giveaway

Gone Writing

Gone Writing

The Reluctant Duchess has released.

Galleys of A Lady Unrivaled have been turned back in.

Now it’s time to finish up the first draft of The Name Thief, first book in the Society Thieves Series, which is due to my editors June 1.

(This image is just one I created for fun, not an actual image for the book)

So I’m holed up for a few days with nothing but my laptop and my notes, ready to knock out the last 30,000 words of this book. You’ll see me again once it’s finished. 😉 (And perhaps checking in on Facebook from time to time.)

Until then, don’t forget to enter Rowena’s Comforts Giveaway!! (And also, note that I added a newsletter signup the right hand margin here on the blog!)

And don’t forget that this weekend is the big Christian Fiction Scavenger Hunt!

Thoughtful About . . . To Each His Own

Thoughtful About . . . To Each His Own

It’s no secret that there are a lot of different types of people in the world. That we all have different personalities. Different outlooks. That there introverts and extroverts and whole personality-naming-systems with letters to label each part of your personality.

Yet we all expect others to be like us. Ever notice that?

It’s not that we don’t recognize people are different. It’s just that when it comes to handling situations . . . when it comes to dealing with grief . . . when it comes to solving problems . . . we cannot fathom that our way is, not just the best way, but the only way.

For instance. I’m not a neat-freak. I am capable of cleaning, and cleaning well. But I do not feel a daily drive to do this. I feel a daily drive to reach a certain word-count goal. I feel a daily drive to pray with my children. I feel a daily drive to do a certain amount of design work. I feel a daily drive to spend time with my husband. Housework slides. Which means that occasionally it gets to the point where I just can’t handle it anymore and I get a bit snappy with the rest of my family for never picking up, and I go on a cleaning rampage. That doesn’t happen often. More often is that once a week I set aside time to take care of the whole house at once.

Those in my family who have the neat-freak drive have tried to tell me that my house would be more manageable if I cleaned, say, twenty minutes every day. And I’m sure that, objectively, this is true. But the thought of finding twenty minutes every day to clean, when I’m going without a pause from 5:30 in the morning until 9:00 at night, Stresses. Me. Out. And the daily stress of, “Ah, man, when am I going to pick up??” adds up, for me, to more stress than that of finding one day a week to do it. Because that’s how I am. It’s who I am. Is it right or wrong? I’m going to go with no. I don’t think my cleaning schedule or lack thereof constitutes a moral dilemma.

And with something like cleaning, most people will shrug their shoulders and say, “Whatever works for you. To each his own.”

But when it comes to more serious topics, people are less likely to say that. As I’ve watched two different people grieve in two very different ways over the last couple months, though, I can’t help but think that it’s about the serious things that we ought to be more willing to understand that people are different.

A lady in my church recently lost a husband. And she knew herself well enough to know what she needed to do after this: establish her schedule and get out of the house. This has helped her cope with the loss. She has good days and bad days, and that’s to be expected. But she’s doing what she needs to do.

My mother-in-law is a very different type of person. When her father passed away, to whom she’d been the sole caretaker for years, everyone was ready with the same advice: “Tell her to get out.”

But to my MIL, getting out is not her feel-better thing. Getting out can cause her stress. As long as I’ve known her, she’s been more likely to want to stay home than to get out. So while, yes, taking my daughter to ballet is something she has volunteered to do on those days she needs a break from her house, what ministers to her more is something like working in her garden.

And that’s okay.

For some of us, people help. For some of us, people hurt.

But if everyone were shouting at my MIL “GET OUT OF THE HOUSE! That’s what you need!” how do you think that would make her feel? Pressured. Frustrated. Like a failure. She’d start wondering if she’s wrong to not want to go out. Which would just upset her more.

Is that healthy? Is that what anyone would be trying to achieve by giving her that advice?

Er, no.

What it comes down to is that there’s no right way to handle emotions–because emotions are different for all of us. My instinct is not to call someone when I’m having a problem. My instinct is not to cry when things go wrong. My instinct is not to throw myself into a crowd when I’m upset. Because when I do those things, they make it worse.

I try, in my writing, to examine this now and again. And when we’re engrossed in the pages of someone else’s story, we can see it. Because we know their thoughts. In life, we don’t have that advantage.

So before I judge anyone for the way they handle their problems, their emotions, their griefs, their joys, I need to stop. I need to consider who they are. I need to wonder what they need. And rather than trying to force them into my mold . . . I need to instead ask, “How can I help them where they are? How they are?”

Sometimes that means joining them at lunch at a restaurant. And sometimes it means coming alongside them in the garden.

And sometimes it means letting them know you’re praying and letting them quietly do the same.

Remember When . . . Rowena Got a Name?

Remember When . . . Rowena Got a Name?

Since The Reluctant Duchess is barely a week old, I thought I’d chat a little today about the heroine in it, Rowena Kinnaird–or more specifically, about her name.

Sometimes, you name a character once, and that’s it. Such was the case with Brice Myerston. Sure, I needed to find a reason for Brice to have as a first name something that wasn’t common to English men at the time, but that was easy enough.

This heroine, however . . .

In a previous draft, her name was Constance Augusta Grant. But she had an Aunt Constance, so she went by Augusta. Only, not Augusta–Gusty.

No one but me liked this. As in, no one. (Pout, pout)

I could ignore that when it was only (ahem) all my critique partners and family who didn’t like “Gusty” as a nickname (come on, y’all–I came up with that when I was 13! Obviously that means it’s SUPER COOL!). I had it all figured out. Wind was going to be a subtle theme in the story. Even Brice’s family home bore the Gaelic word for “Wind.” (Gaoth–which, by the way, you pronounce “Gway.” I know, right?) But then, when I turned in my synopsis before I started writing, my editors asked for a new name, so . . . guess who got a new name, LOL. (The wind theme is still here and there through the book. Better read it to see if you can find it, wink, wink. I even just gave you the first one!)

If one were to scroll back through the chats I exchanged with my best friend/crit parnter during the renaming process, one would have seen that I soon found all the most ridiculous and difficult to pronounce Scottish names in the world. Not that I intended to use them, but they were certainly entertaining. =) Really though, I knew what her name would be if it weren’t Gusty.

Rowena.

I’d always loved the name. Loved it so much, in fact, that I’d already planned to use it later in the series for another, minor, character. In the previous version in which I’d already used it, there was a very important rowan tree; so someone was named after this rowan tree. But I knew I intended to name my son Rowyn if I had a boy (I was in fact pregnant with him when writing this previous version of the book), and I didn’t want a character with my son’s name. So the character was instead a girl, and had a similar sounding name. Rowena.

Did I want to “steal” the name for my heroine? It took me a few hours to decide. But yes, yes I did.

And so, Gusty became Rowena.

But her previous last name wouldn’t work either–Grant is a real Scottish clan, which means that the Grants had a real chief and a real estate at this point in history. And I didn’t want to risk maligning them with my not-so-nice chief, Rowena’s father. Plus I wanted the freedom to place this clan, their home, etc. wherever I pleased. So rather than choose a real clan, I talked with my historical writers group, who advised I choose a real Scottish name that isn’t actually a clan on its own. One of the ladies even offered up hers. 😉 She told me Kinnaird was a sept (branch) of an existing clan, but didn’t have its own chief or anything. So Kinnaird (you say it kin-AIRD — and roll that R, baby!) it was, with my hats off to Deb.

Overall, I love this new name much better than my old one. But yeah, I’ll admit it . . . my editor caught a Gusty that had slipped into the first draft, LOL.

Evolution of other character names in the series, from first draft when I was a kid through final:

Brook Eden — started life as Brook Moon
Justin Wildon — has always been Justin Wildon, though his titles have changed
Regan — used to be Megan
Melissa — was always Melissa
Aunt Mary — used to be two characters, actually. Aunts Lisa (nothing screams Victorian England like the name “Lisa” right?) and Marie. (I may have had a good friend in middle school named Lisa Marie…)
Deirdre — used to be Lyddie
Douglas Kinnaird — used to be Douglas Grant
Lord Cayton — used to be Kent
Lady Catherine — her name hasn’t changed, but she wasn’t Brook’s cousin in earlier versions

Just FYI, I’m about to turn in the second round of edits on Book 3, A Lady Unrivaled. And I would just like to say that Ella has always been Ella. And she is so very Ella. 😉

Word of the Week – Mean

Word of the Week – Mean

I always find it interesting to see how very common words have changed over time–and mean is certainly one that has shifted around quite a bit!

I’m going to focus solely on the adjective version of the word today, though it’s worth noting that through the years, some of the changes to mean‘s meaning (ha…ha…ha) is because of it’s noun definition (“that which is in the middle or between extremes”–a definition mostly retained these days in math).

When mean first entered the English language back in 1200 (you know…when the English language first entered the English language), it meant “of low quality; common to all.” Within a hundred years there was a subtle shift to “inferior, second-rate.” This was of things–think of the second verse of “What Child Is This?”: “why lies he in such mean estate…?”–but it came from an application to people that had arisen earlier in the 1300s, that of a low or inferior rank.

The word carried these meanings of “common” or “inferior” for quite a while. In the 1660s, it took a bit of a turn and started to mean “stingy, nasty.”

So when did our main meaning today (“not obliging, pettily offensive”) come into play? Interestingly, not until 1839, and it was American slang. The inverted meaning of “remarkable good” (think, “She plays a mean piano”) is from about 1900, probably a shortened form of “no mean _____”)

~*~
Don’t forget about all the giveaways going on!
Ladies in Defiance Giveaway
(Four days left as of when I’m publishing this)
(17 hours left as of when I’m publishing this)
COMING SOON