Word of the Week – Moon

Word of the Week – Moon

We talk a lot at Word of the Week about words that are shockingly new or have interesting roots. Well, moon is neither of those things. 😉 But it’s still a fascinating word to study, because of its ancient, ANCIENT history.

It’s no great surprise that the biggest constant in our night sky received a name on day one. Okay, day four, if we’re going by the Genesis narrative. 😉 Which means that the oldest languages we have record of and which led to the languages we know today, which etymologists refer to as the “proto-Indo-European” language or PIE, have the very root word from which moon is derived: me(n)ses. Not all variations preserve that n in the middle, but some do. And historically, the word for the heavenly body and the word for the cycle of that heavenly body, have been interchangeable (moon has meant “month” even in English forever, as an example). Which is where we get:

Mona – Old English and Old Frisian
Mone – Middle English
Moon – Modern English
Mano – Old Saxon and Old High German
Mani – Old Norse
Maane – Danish
Maan – Dutch
Mond – German
Masah – Sanskrit
Mah – Persian
Mis – Armenian
Mene – Greek
Mensis – Latin
Meseci – Old Church Slavonic
Menesis – Lithuanian
Mi – Old Irish
Mis – Welsh
Miz – Breton

By the 1500s, the moon was used metaphorically to refer to anything out of reach. It wasn’t until 1665 that moon was used to refer to the satellite of any planet.

As for the verb that is, ahem, usually used in reference to pulling one’s clothing down, that particular prank, let’s call it, didn’t earn the name moon until the 1960s–it’s probably from a sense of moon being slang for the buttocks from the 1760s but is likely also influenced by a sense dating to the early 1600s meaning “to expose to the moonlight.” The verb sense of “idle about or gaze moodily” is from the 1830s.

So what about Luna? In Latin, Luna was the goddess of the moon, and the word came to mean “the moon” as well, as a differentiation from mensis, which also meant month. Both words could refer to the heavenly body, but Luna carried the sense of a deity and mensis of the physical body whose movements help us tell time.

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Inhuman Reactions

Inhuman Reactions

23 When He got into the boat, His disciples followed Him. 24 And behold, a violent storm developed on the sea, so that the boat was being covered by the waves; but Jesus Himself was asleep. 25 And they came to Him and woke Him, saying, “Save us, Lord; we are perishing!” 26 He *said to them, “Why are you afraid, you men of little faith?” Then He got up and rebuked the winds and the sea, and it became perfectly calm. 27 The men were amazed, and said, “What kind of a man is this, that even the winds and the sea obey Him?” ~ Matthew 8:23-27 (NASB)

In a book study in my church a few weeks ago, we were give four Bible passages (the one above, Matt 8:1-3 [leper who was cleansed], Matt 9:2-7 [paralytic whose friends brought him to be healed], and Matt 9:20-22 [woman with the issue of blood]) to read and then asked, “Which one do you most connect with or relate to?”

We talked through all of them, but in my group, the first, gut reaction was that we connected with the story of the disciples on the stormy sea. Because which of us hasn’t felt as though we’re in the midst of a storm at some point in our lives? Who among us hasn’t been in a literal storm that was scary? But even more, who hasn’t been in an emotional or circumstancial one?

Much like the disciples, I bet our instincts were right-on. We know to run to Jesus, just like they did. We know to cry out, “Save us, Lord! We’re dying here!”

But when we read that passage above, it becomes clear that Jesus’ method of saving them was not what they were expecting. They were shocked. HUGELY shocked. This–calming the very wind and waves–was not something they thought He could do.

So…what did they expect?

As I pondered the question, only one thing came to mind: they were expecting a normal, human reaction. They expected Him to wake up from His nap and lend a hand. They expected Him to maybe grab an oar or a line to a sail. Maybe even to lead them in a prayer for salvation asking God to calm the seas.

Jesus didn’t do that. He didn’t react as a human would. He didn’t do the human thing. He calmed the wind and the waves. He spoke, and it was so. Nature obeyed.

Then look at that story in Matthew 9:2-7, when the paralytic is brought by his friends to Jesus. They were obviously expecting something physical–a healing. Why else bring someone to a healer? They were demanding an appointment with the Great Physician.

But again, what did Jesus do? He looked at the faith of those friends and the paralyzed man and said, “Take courage, son. Your sins are forgiven.”

He was still paralyzed at that moment. Let that sink in. He’d come to Jesus for a healing in his legs, but Jesus looked and saw something much more important. He saw souls in need of a savior, and He offered that man the better good. He offered Him eternity. Salvation. Forgiveness.

And what does the man do?

We don’t actually know–we don’t see his reaction. But the Gospel writers certainly didn’t record any complaining on the part of the man or his friends. Nor do we see them saying, “Hey, wait a minute…who do you think you are? You can’t forgive sins.” Nope, only scribes were thinking that. And it was in response to their disbelief that He healed the man physically too, to offer them something visible.

But it wasn’t His first response. His first response, as always, was more concerned with the soul than the body. And I like to think (since we’re not told otherwise) that when that man had his sins forgiven, he was too overwhelmed with the peace and joy of that to even care that his legs still weren’t working right.

Then Jesus issued a command: “Take up your mat and go home.”

I love that, unlike some healings we see, where Jesus physically acts and the results follow, this one relies on the faith of the recipient. What if the man had shaken his head and said, “Lord, I can’t. That’s why I’m here.”?

My guess is that healing wouldn’t have followed, because he didn’t follow the word of the Lord. But he does. As simple as that. He stands up. Rolls up the mat his friends had been carrying him on. And he goes home. Presumably he had that faith even before he came, otherwise why would they have done so?

But I imagine it was all the more intense because he’d just been forgiven. Something no man could ever do for him.

Doctors can help heal us.
Prophets raised the dead and healed people many times.
The disciples themselves healed plenty.

But only Jesus could look a man in the eye and say, “Your sins are forgiven.” That was the real miracle done that day. The miracle of Jesus tending not the human, physical need, but one so much deeper. So much bigger.

How often, when we take our hurts and our troubles and our broken hearts to God, do we expect Him to react like us? Like humans? To tend to the physical in regular ways?

What if instead of lending a hand in the boat, we expect Him to calm the seas? What if, instead of fixing our circumstances, we trust Him to heal our hearts?

What if we expected our God to do something more than our human selves can do?

Word of the Week – Resurrect

Word of the Week – Resurrect

Did you know that resurrect didn’t exist as a word until the 1770s?!

I know, go ahead. Shake your head and said, “Nuh uh!” I know I did. But it’s true!

Resurrect is what etymologists refer to as a “back-formation.” Which is to say, we’ve had the noun, resurrection, in the English language pretty much forever (since about 1300), so eventually people just assumed it came from a verb (correct, it did) and began using that verb, resurrect. But it’s technically (or was technically) incorrect–that’s not the verb form of the word.

The noun resurrection came to us from Latin, via French. The Latin verb is resurgere, meaning “to rise again, to appear again.” Most Biblical translations will say that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, and that Christ himself was raised from the dead. We could also say the proper verb…resurge. That’s what would have been used until the 1770s.

When resurrection made its way into English around 1300, it was specifically talking about the resurrection of Christ. And by extension, “the resurrection of the dead in the last days” that He promised. In the 1500s, people began to use it metaphorically or in less-sacred senses.

Whatever the correct verb form, I pray everyone enjoys this season where we celebrate the resurrection of our Lord…to commemorate when He resurged. 😉

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

Why Did He Die?

Why Did He Die?

30 The Pharisees and their scribes began grumbling to His disciples, saying, “Why do you eat and drink with the tax collectors and sinners?” 31 And Jesus answered and said to them, It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick. 32 I have not come to call the righteous to repentance, but sinners.” ~Luke 5:30-32

When I read the verses above as a teenager, I remember frowning and reading them again. Wait a minute, I thought. Why does He say this? Paul tells us we are ALL sinners, that NONE of us is righteous…and Jesus surely knew that. Right? So what’s He saying here?

It’s a valid question. Because we DO know that we are all sinners. Which means that He came to call us ALL to repentance. We ALL need His healing touch.

But not everyone will admit it. Not everyone will go to that Great Physician, even though they need it. Plenty of people, then and now, think of it as “us” (the righteous) versus “them” (the sinners). And what’s Jesus’ response to that? “Guess what–I came for them. So until you admit you’re one of ‘them,’ I guess you’re not at the table with Me.”

A few weeks ago, I conducted a little experiment on social media. I commented on a post condemning the Left, which used some really nasty names, asking if perhaps we’d make more strides if we didn’t villainize them. Well, after a number of comments over the course of a week, one appeared that had me gaping. In which a man condemned me to hell for trying to understand a different perspective. I made it clear I was not CONDONING certain behavior, simply trying to understand it so that I knew how to pray for people and how to love them like Christ loves them. And THAT was the thing he said would send me to hell. Trying to understand someone I don’t agree with. He accused me of “cavorting with evil.”

I immediately thought of that Scripture above, when the so-called “faithful” accused Christ of hanging out with sinners. 

Jesus is where the sinners are, friends. But they don’t stay sinners when they recognize their need for Him. Or rather, they become sinners saved by grace. Are our political “enemies” suddenly beyond His hand just because they haven’t accepted Him yet? Or because they understand things differently? Do we really think the answer is to condemn them all, along with anyone who tries to understand them?

Jesus certainly didn’t think so. When His disciples wanted to rain down fire and brimstone, He rebuked them. Most versions leave it at that, but some manuscripts add this: “You do not know of what kind of spirit you are; for the Son of Man did not come to destroy people’s lives, but to save them.”

As we progress through Holy Week, I think this is an important scripture to keep in mind. Jesus was on His way to Jerusalem, in His final days on earth, when this happened. His disciples have been with Him for three years already, and still they think this is the right action. To prove their power. To prove their might. To wipe from the earth a Samaritan town (so not among the “faithful”) who didn’t welcome Him.

But Jesus’ eyes were already on the cross. He knew His purpose. And it was not to destroy. It was to save.

That needs to be our purpose too. NOT to prove our power. NOT to use it to destroy our enemies.

To love them as Christ did, so that they may be saved.

Jesus didn’t come to die for those who thought they could get to heaven on their own, who have the right ideas or the right education or are members of the right political party or the right church. He came to die for sinners.

For those who, upon meeting Him, recognize their need for Him.
For those who don’t confuse strength with power.
For those willing to beat their chests and cry out, “Have mercy on me, a sinner!” instead of sneering at those who we perceive as unrighteous.

Tomorrow, we remember the day Christ gave His all, His very life, on the cross. Not for the righteous. For the sinners. For us–all of us. For them.

Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world.
Have mercy on us.
Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world.
Have mercy on us.
Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world.
Grant us peace.

Word of the Week – Palm

Word of the Week – Palm

Since yesterday was Palm Sunday, I thought it would be fun to look at the etymology of the word palm.

Not shockingly, it’s been in English a long time–since the 1300s. And it comes from a root that means “flat.” So in reference to the palm of the hand, it’s describing the flat part of the hand.

From there, the palm trees got their names because of the flat leaves and branches with “fingers” on them. Of course, these trees aren’t native to England, so that early knowledge of the trees mostly came thanks to the story of Palm Sunday.

Why palms, though? Because in the ancient world, palm fronds were word on carried as a symbol of victory (much like a laurel leaf crown).

Did you attend a Palm Sunday service yesterday?

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts