Word of the Week – Tuesday

Word of the Week – Tuesday

Let’s continue our dive into the names for days of the week! In the case of Tuesday, it at once follows the same pattern, naming the day after the god whose celestial body’s hour was the first hour of the day in the Neo-Babylonion empire (days were broken up into seven hours, so each day began with a new hour.)

In the case of Tuesday, however, it isn’t quite as one-to-one as Sunday (after the sun) and Monday (after the moon) in our English translation.

In that ancient empire, the third day of the week was named for Mars, the planet closest to earth and the god of war. There are plenty of languages that reflect this still, like French’s Mardi.

In Middle English, the word for this day of the week was spelled Tiues-dai. That was, in turn, taken from Old English tiwesdaeg. The Tiwes here is the possessive form of Tiu, who was the god war in Germanic mythology. Interestingly, though, while this ancient god is the equivalent of Mars in many ways, unlike Mars in Roman mythology, Tiu was the supreme god in German mythology, so the name itself is actually more closely related to Zeus.

We already covered Wednesday, so next week, we’ll jump to Thursday!

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

The Romance in My Romantasy Books

The Romance in My Romantasy Books

I love romance novels. It’s most of what I read, whatever else be part of the genre–suspense, historical, contemporary, fantasy, you name it. 

So when people ask me what I write, that’s always my honest answer too. I primarily write romanceIt isn’t the only thing I write (my mysteries for Guideposts aren’t romances), and my books always have something else in them too, sure. But generally speaking, that’s how I’d classify them.

So I always find it funny when people bring my books up in conversations where folks have asked for recommendations for books that are not primarily romance. There’s always a part of me that goes, “What? Y’all, that’s a romance! Follows all the conventions and everything!” And yet at the same time, I definitely appreciate that people who aren’t as romance-crazy as me love my books and recommend them to other people who prefer their romances to be not-central. What that tells me is that the history and suspense are indeed playing an equal role in the plot–which is in fact the definition of those compound-genres like “historical romance” or “romantic suspense.”

Then I launched my first romantasy with Awakened. And…I got a couple questions. So I thought it would be fun to take a day and talk about the romance–the levels, the amount, the type–in the Awakened books, who they’re aimed at, who they’re appropriate for, and why I made the choices I did.

What Is Romantasy?

First, let’s talk about the genre. The name “romantasy” is only a few years old, and you can no doubt tell by reading it what it is. Romance + Fantasy. Before some brilliant person coined this word, authors had two choices when classifying their books: romantic fantasy or fantasy romance.

They may look the same–but they’re not. Romantic fantasy was used for a book that was primarily fantasy but had a romance thread in it. Fantasy romance was used for a book that was primarily romance but with light fantasy elements.

But what about books that were equal parts BOTH? That were firmly fantasy, with grand world-building, high stakes, and epic quests…but also very much about the romance, where it was the relationship between hero and heroine that fueled the plot?

Maybe in years gone by, there weren’t enough of those to need a new name. But in recent years, such books have EXPLODED in popularity. And so, a new name was given. Romantasy. And for lovers of this genre, they know exactly why the word works and why the genre has grown so incredibly popular.

Romantasy books have both a world and a romance that sweep you away. They have heroes that make you swoon and heroines you’d love to be. They’re rather famous for the “fated mate” trope, which is the concept of this love being fated, bigger than emotion or attraction, written in the stars, so to speak. Ordained. Necessary. Usually, this match has world-wide/kingdom-wide impact. They can do together what neither could do apart.

I LOVE THAT. I have always loved that, and I love that there’s a genre that celebrates that kind of love. Because isn’t that what we all long for? Someone who loves us so completely, at a cellular level, down to the soul?

My Romantasies

So when I decided to write a romantasy, I knew I wanted to hit those same notes. I wanted the fated love, I wanted the BIG love, I wanted that strong attraction that those sorts of loves always have in the extremely-popular mainstream romances. But I wanted it to do something else too.

I wanted it to show this big, swoony, fated love in a God-honoring way.

See, the majority of mainstream romantasies are unapologetically steamy. Those big, fated loves come with big, overwhelming attractions that lead the characters into rather predictable situations. They’re about real love, yes–with a lot of lust thrown in.

And here’s the thing…while I think most of them are depicted in extremely unrealistic ways, I also know very well that most of us will experience a tempting attraction at some point in our lives.

It’s real.

And because it’s real, it can be devastating. I know so many Christians who chose not to wait for marriage because that love and its physical side overwhelmed them. Or because societal expectations swayed them from what they’d been taught. Or for whatever other reason. 

Attraction is REAL. Lust is REAL. Temptation is REAL. And today’s society is so welcoming of it that it’s hard to avoid the message that it’s also good and enjoyable and totally fine to indulge in. Even when we know better. Even when we’ve been taught that there’s a proper order, that there’s a right and a wrong way to handle it.

With Awakened, I wanted to show that big, could-be-overwhelming love. That deep attraction. And I also wanted to  show how you could feel it and still honor God.

In that first book in this series, my hero is attracted to the heroine almost immediately, and he falls hard and fast. He also refuses to disrespect her. He refuses to dishonor his God. This hero is meant to show readers that you can feel these strong emotions, the ones God Himself created mankind to experience, and not sin.

And the heroine? Arden had always been overlooked. She never thought of herself as pretty. So to have that attention of a very attractive man would be heady. In mainstream romantasies, she probably would have been swept off her feet. I’ve read many books with such a heroine where the hero’s attention is even termed “worship,” as he shows her very physically how beautiful he finds her and so boosts her ego.

In my version, he shows her in a God-honoring way how attractive he finds her…and she pushes him away in an attempt to protect his heart. Because she truly believes someone else is that fated love for him, and she will sacrifice whatever she must to see them happy.

Why did I choose to write Awakened like this?

In part because I’m writing these books for romantasy readers–readers who are THERE for the big romance, who COME for the big romance.

But also because I wanted to show that “big romance” does not require sin. Big romance does not require falling prey to temptation. Big romance can in fact be God-ordained.

And when embraced with God, when properly ordered–when the two want to respect and honor each other and stay true to faith–God rewards that.

In this series, I also have married couples, even honeymoons. They are “closed door” in that we do not EVER get anything more than kissing in my books, aside from vague phrases like “when they could catch their breath again” or even “they made love” in a list of things they did the night before…because this is right and good in marriage. Married couples should be enjoying each other. There’s nothing wrong with it. No shame in it. So while I will never describe it, I find no problem in mentioning that such things happen.

Why?

Because, again, I want to remind us all that God did NOT create us as merely spiritual beings. He created us as physical beings. He created attraction. He made mankind with a sex drive–and then, as with our every other drive, He instructed us in the good and proper way of using it and also set boundaries for what was not good and proper.

We see so much of that “not.” Both where it’s celebrated and, in Christian circles, where it’s condemned. But what about the celebration of the right way?

I have long been of the mind that by ignoring problems, we don’t fix them. And the world’s view of sex is a problem, friends. It’s undervalued and yet over-indulged. Which means it’s degraded. The unity that should be one of the most rewarding, amazing experiences in a couple’s life is downgraded to a “fun hookup.” And yet if Christian fiction just ignores that people feel that physical attraction, how does that equip them to deal with the emotions and temptations when they strike?

In my historicals, I’m usually dealing with societies that have norms quite different from ours. Their society and expectations were stricter. It was expected that attraction would be constrained. But today? And in fantasy worlds? Very different expectation. And so, while my historical romances may by some be classified as “not that strong a romance,” I wanted my romantasies to be something different.

I want them to appeal to all the people like me who are THERE for the big romance, for the characters who feel that strong physical attraction, for the fated loves…and to remind us all that God still needs to be in the midst. He is there in our hearts as those hearts fill with romantic love. And that, too, is good. He made it, and He meant us to enjoy it…in the right way.

So Who Are My Romantasies For?

First and foremost, I wrote these books for people who love the genre but want books that choose that God-honoring approach to romantic love. I also wrote them in the hopes that people who love mainstream romantasies might find them and get a glimpse of God without even knowing that’s what they were signing up for. I wrote them, too, for readers who love Christian romance and want something new and fresh–because while there are quite a bit of “closed door” or self-proclaimed “clean” romantasies out there, most of them aren’t overtly faith-based, and much of it doesn’t have that same feel that the big romantasy series do.

I will also say that these are NOT intended to be young adult (aimed at teens). None of my books are explicitly aimed at teens. That doesn’t mean that they’re inappropriate for teens, but it is a family-by-family decision. I would have been totally fine handing Awakened or any of my other books to my daughter when she was in high school, but I do NOT tell every parent “They’re fine.” Because my books often talk about hard things, and I don’t know if your kids have been exposed to those yet, or if you’re ready for them to be. If they’re ready to be.

will say that if teens are reading mainstream books–even ones specifically marked as Young Adult–then my books should all be fine for them, this series included. I read enough mainstream YA to tell you that even the “clean” ones talk about real-world things like violence, sex, abuse, etc., more than mine get into such things, and that they certainly don’t all approach it from the biblical perspective, as I will always attempt to do.

So are my romantasies for you? Are they for your teens? I can’t answer that–I can just give you all that information above and let you decide. And when it comes to handing books to your teenagers, I will also say that the great thing about sharing books with them that you’ve also read is that you can talk about it. You can talk about the contrast with other books, about whether you like or don’t like how certain things were handled, you can talk about why I may or may not have made certain decisions. Conversation is good!

Awakened Vs. the Other Books in the Series

Confession: whatever book I’m writing, I spend way more time thinking about the romance than any other part of the plot (Guideposts mysteries being the exception there). This, in my mind, is the heart of the story, and I want to make sure I’m getting those emotions just right. I could not begin to tally the hours I have spent thinking and rethinking the romantic elements in Amazed, book three, which I’m writing now. During the year that I was working on Awakened, those countless hours were spent dreaming of Arden and Seidon and their every flirtatious line, their first kiss, the whole romance arc. The same is true of my historical couples too. Because this is my brain, LOL.

You only see a fragment, because for some reason no one wants to publish a book that’s a million words long. 😉 But hopefully, the fragment you get is satisfying.

So, for all the reasons mentioned above, Awakened had a big romance. There was kissing. There was attraction. It was God-honoring. By modern definitions, it isn’t “spicy,” but there’s some heat. Again, God-honoring. Not sinful. I definitely have readers that deemed it “too much.” And others who said, “FINALLY!” Only you know where you fall that spectrum. 😉 But here’s where the rest of the series falls in relation.

In Aflame, there are four points-of-view and several romances. One main one. Early readers have deemed it “swoon-worthy,” but it is definitely NOT to the same level as Awakened. Honestly, one of my main concerns with this book which I put to my early readers was “Is the romance big enough?” It felt tame and almost after-thought-ish to me, compared to Awakened, so I did quite a bit of editing to make sure that it hit the right notes, even though the plot in this one is much more, er…plotty? Let’s pretend that’s a word, LOL. There’s SO MUCH ACTION in this book, political intrigue, a grassroots rebellion, and Kyrja has to discover faith too. So the romance is gentler, for sure. It’s soft and sweet. 

In the first two novellas in the series, Captivated and Celebrated, each has only one on-page kiss, and the stories are much more focused on getting the characters to the moment of confession-of-love/deciding to be together amidst some suspenseful events. Again, the romances are key but not quite as consuming.

The longer novella (coming soon, as of when I’m writing this) is called Consecrated, and it’s actually a dual love story. Yes, I’m insane and packed TWO romances and four points-of-view into a 56,000-word short-novel. One of the romances is super sweet. The other veers more toward Awakened levels of attraction, though again, always God-honoring. Just kisses that send pulses racing.

Eventually I will also finish the prequel novel that is sitting halfway done on my computer as of when I’m writing this, called ForetoldForetold is the story of the First Sea King, and if you’ve read Awakened, you know he is remembered as being an evil man. There’s more to him than that…but he’s a bit of a Solomon story. And having read your Bible, I’m sure you know that Solomon began as a man of wisdom who followed God…then he fell into idolatry because of the indulgences he granted his many, many, many, many wives and concubines. He brings us the most evocative book in the Bible–Song of Solomon. And also what I might call the saddest–Ecclesiastes, which focuses so very much on all the vain and hopeless things in life.

That’s where the Sea King is when this story opens. He’s a man who was once close to the Triada but who had fallen to his own weaknesses so many times in his long life that he’d given up. Thought himself beyond redemption…and more, thought redemption not worth striving for, since he’d just fail again. Like Solomon, he has a thing for beautiful women. And like Solomon, he sees no reason to deny himself. 

So for this book, I actually start with a warning, which I have never done before. I want my readers to know that this is a story of redemption, that it is closed door, but it also has a point-of-view character who is lost to sexual sins at the start, so he’s thinking that way. Again, nothing explicit, but it’s definitely not ignored. 

I haven’t written enough of book three, Amazed, to really rank it well with the others, but thus far it’s “warmer” on the scale than Aflame…not sure how it compares directly to Awakened. Might get close, certainly no “more.”

So…there we have it. My view of romantasies in general, why I love them, and my goals with writing my own. More, my reasons for writing this series as I’ve done. And to remind us all that God has no problem with big romance and strong attraction…as long as we still honor Him through it.

Word of the Week – Monday

Word of the Week – Monday

If you already read last week’s word about why the first day of the week is named after the sun, this week’s might be a little boring. But in case you’re coming here fresh JUST for this word, I’m going to include the same generaly history. 😉 So…why is the second day of the week Monday?

First: Monday = Moonday

The Middle English was spelled Monedai and the Old English was mōndæg, which was itself a contraction of mōnandæg (monan meaning “moon”).

The tradition, though, is even more ancient. Scholars believe the astronomical naming of days goes back to the Neo-Babylonian empire, dating to around the time of the Jewish exile in Babylon, though the first written record of the system is from the Roman empire era.

In this naming system, each day is broken up into seven hours, and each hour given the name of a prominent god after whom a celestial body was named. The first hour of each day gave that day its name.

Sunday, therefore, is named after the sun because that day of the week began with the hour of the sun. Monday, on the other hand, began with the hour of the moon–the second in the list of celestial-deities.

Many languages still preserve this tradition. For instance, in French, the word for Monday is Lundi, given that lune is the word for moon.

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts

On Broken Vessels in Leadership

On Broken Vessels in Leadership

When I shared my disillusion with my political party in light of Trump and the way many Christians I know personally view him not as “the lesser of two evils” but specifically as someone to defend, no matter what he does, I heard from a lot of people who certainly didn’t go that far, but who began using a few phrases over and again (different people).

He is a “broken vessel” that God is using.

He is a King Cyrus.

He is a King David.

Now, I’m a historical novelist. I get the need to liken what’s going on today to what has happened before. This is a legit way to view our current world, through that lens of history, and something I love to do myself. Which means that when I see claims like those above, I can’t help but look into them.

First, what’s the point of the claims? Universally, they’re to point out that God uses imperfect, broken humans to bring about His divine will. I think we can all agree on that, right? He absolutely does.

God used King Cyrus, a foreign king who did not believe in the One True God but respected Him and those who did, to end Israel’s exile. In this context, Cyrus was called “anointed” by God, even calling him “my shepherd.” This example absolutely shows us that God will use even unbelievers to further His apointed work for His people. I love that. Could God be doing that with Trump? He absolutely could.

Is He? I think that’s a separate question, which requires asking what the will of God is for America. Which is a rather big question, and one I’ll put a pin for later. 😉 But for the purposes of this conversation, I think we can grant that this is always a possibility–that God will use our leaders, whatever their faith or beliefs, for His purposes.

But let’s not forget that God also used the kings who led Israel into exile and called them anointed for His purpose too, like Nebechudnezzer. Sometimes, His purpose for those He loves is not just to “restore” but to “break.” Those kings, too, served part of His divine will–but it doesn’t mean that will is desirable, nor does it mean it wouldn’t have better to repent and avoid the exile. And it certainly doesn’t mean we’re obligated to agree with our leaders on things just because they’re our leaders.

Two sides, same coin. Which is right? I’m not here to say…just to ask the questions.

But…what about that King David one? This one is actually traced to prophecies claiming that Trump is God’s “new David.” This one I find much more troubling.

Because David was not anointed for his raw power. David was not anointed for his money. David was not anointed because he was a “winner.” David was anointed because he had a heart that always chased after God.

He faltered, failed, and sinned grievously, yes. He did the unthinkable. And when the prophet Nathan pointed it out to him, he repented. This is what marks the Davidic heart and anointing, in my opinion. NOT what he did–but how he sought God.

Is that what our leaders today are doing? Are they rending their garments when spiritual leaders point out their hypocrisy? Are they refusing to lift a hand against the previous leaders, also anointed by God (if we truly believe that passage from Romans 13 that say that ALL authority is put in place by God…which includes Biden, Obama, and Clinton)?

Which brings me to the broken vessels.

Does God use broken vessels? ABSOLUTELY, and I praise Him for that mercy. Because we’re all broken.

But here’s the thing–God does not leave us broken. When He pours His spirit into us, His vessels, the point is always to pour it back out onto those around us. When we’re broken, cracked, full of holes, that Spirit and its fruits can’t flow like it’s supposed to…it spills into the ground in waste. But we serve the Potter.

He mends us. Fixes us. Reshapes us. We may never reach perfection this side of heaven, but that doesn’t mean He expects us to remain in that cracked and broken state in which He finds us. Right? When we put ourselves into the Potter’s hands, we are trusting Him to make us into something new–a new vessel.

That’s the healing power of His love, of His mercy, of His grace. 

That’s the David spirit. 

So…again, is that what we’re seeing? First in ourselves–am I letting Him fix my broken places? Am I submitting to Him in humility? Am I putting myself in His hands and truly trusting Him to correct my vision where it’s wrong, to repent of my own bad behavior and sins, to be made into something new? Am I asking Him to point out the error in my assumptions and judgments?

Or am I clinging to my brokenness and even glorifying it? Am I proud to be judgmental? To be set in my ways? To be convinced I’m right? Am I more concerned about my vessel than the work it’s supposed to be doing? More focused on being one of those “for honor” than in the people I’m supposed to be serving?

The question always has to start with me–with us. And I am never going to say someone else is or is not a genuine Christian…but if they claim to speak for people of faith, I will look at their fruits, because that’s what we’re told to do, and decide whether I’ll align with them or not. Whether I will let them speak for me. Sometimes, you can see very clearly where those broken places are. I’m not saying to judge them for them. But I think we do need to ask ourselves what our lines are in those we support.

Yes, David was an adulterer and a murderer. Not marks in his favor. But he did repent. He did not claim that sin as a win.

When it comes to politics, we’re never going to have anything but broken vessels to choose between–we’re all just people, after all. All broken. But how do we determine which cracks we’re okay with and which we’re not? Are we honest enough to admit that it’s because of what they do for us?

And do we extend that same graceful analogy to those we don’t agree with? Do we say that God used Stalin and Hitler and Mao for His purposes too? Do we admit that sometimes His purposes are to test us, and sometimes He finds us lacking? That sometimes the leaders He puts in place are to shake us down? Sometimes, even, to see if we’ll follow a human leader above following God, like with the kings of old who led Israel into idolatry?

Does saying someone was anointed by God mean we don’t hold them accountable for their sins and failures, that we excuse anything they do as long as they fight for what we want? I don’t think it does. I think we’re called to answer to God above man, and that He is watching what we condone. I don’t believe the ends justify the means. I don’t believe the outcome is all that matters. I believe the how matters too, and that we can’t honestly say “I can’t stand before God if I voted for a baby-killer” and not also say, “I can’t stand before God if I voted for an adulterer” or “someone who refused to feed the poor” or “someone who said he refuses to forgive.” All of those are sins. What ranks one above another?

We are all broken vessels, our elected officials included. But are we content to stay that way? Or will we let the Spirit that He pours into us remake us…even when that means letting go of the sins we’ve clung to so fiercely, for so long?

Other Hard Topics Posts

Is America a Christian Nation?

Is America a Christian Nation?

I don’t think anyone could argue against the assertion that America’s foundational documents are greatly informed by Christian principles…but are we truly a Christian nation?

read more
A Soft Answer

A Soft Answer

A soft answer really does turn away wrath–and one that seeks to understand rather than be understood can make new friends. I can prove it.

read more
Why Now?

Why Now?

Should I be worrying about these things while I’m fighting cancer?

read more
Word of the Week – Sunday

Word of the Week – Sunday

Why is the first day of the week named for the sun?

The answer is fairly ancient. Scholars believe the astronomical naming of days goes back to the Neo-Babylonian empire, dating to around the time of the Jewish exile in Babylon, though the first written record of the system is from the Roman empire era.

In this naming system, each day is broken up into seven hours, and each hour given the name of a prominent god after whom a celestial body was named. The first hour of each day gave that day its name.

Sunday, therefore, is named after the sun because that day of the week began with the hour of the sun.

This naming system is quite extensive throughout the world, and it came to English via the Germanic language. It’s interesting to note, however, that other European languages without Germanic influence have instead chosen a name for this first day of the week that means “the Lord’s Day.”

Word Nerds Unite!

Read More Word of the Week Posts