Okay, this was not what I intended to blog about today, but a friend shared the link, and now I’m too excited to write about anything else. =)
In a recent press release, AMC (as in, awesome channel that has Mad Men and The Walking Dead and those other hit shows…) has ordered the pilot of a new series called Turn…based on the exploits of the Culper Ring as told in Alexander Rose’s Washington Spies.
Now, if you’ve been reading my blog for a while, then you know that Washington’s Spies is the book I used as my primary research for Ring of Secrets. So the fact that a TV show will be based on the same…well, that’s pretty cool!
It looks like production of Turn will start in 2013, which means Ring of Secrets will be out well before the show. My gut-reaction to that is that this is good–it’ll be clear that my book isn’t a spin-off of the show, but if Turn takes off (as AMC’s series have done lately), then anyone looking up similar books will find mine. Sweet!
Curious as to my take on this book that has inspired a series? Well, I posted a review last year, which I’m happy to share again.
~*~
Originally posted on 5/17/11
Would you believe I haven’t read
any fiction in the last week-plus? Primarily because I’ve spent my free
time doing research for a story idea. So I figure, eh, might as well
talk to you about that! =)
any fiction in the last week-plus? Primarily because I’ve spent my free
time doing research for a story idea. So I figure, eh, might as well
talk to you about that! =)
I’ll
confess it from the start–I don’t read much non-fiction. Why? Because I
read so much of it during college that I just got burned out on it. But
apparently it’s now been long enough since then (where did that time
go, anyway?) that I can read it again without feeling at all put out
about it. Handy, since in looking up info about the subject of my newest
idea, I came across a very interesting-sounding book that I knew would
be helpful: Washington’s Spies by Alexander Rose.
confess it from the start–I don’t read much non-fiction. Why? Because I
read so much of it during college that I just got burned out on it. But
apparently it’s now been long enough since then (where did that time
go, anyway?) that I can read it again without feeling at all put out
about it. Handy, since in looking up info about the subject of my newest
idea, I came across a very interesting-sounding book that I knew would
be helpful: Washington’s Spies by Alexander Rose.
My
Library didn’t have this one, but thanks to the wonders of ILL, they
had it for me in three days, and I cracked it open with genuine
enthusiasm. I haven’t read any non-fiction on the Revolutionary War
since college (and then it was more political treatises of the era, not
history of the war), so I found this to be a wonderful refresher on the
history in general. Better still, it focused entirely on the use of
espionage in the war, by both sides. And really, what could be more fun
than that? 😉
Library didn’t have this one, but thanks to the wonders of ILL, they
had it for me in three days, and I cracked it open with genuine
enthusiasm. I haven’t read any non-fiction on the Revolutionary War
since college (and then it was more political treatises of the era, not
history of the war), so I found this to be a wonderful refresher on the
history in general. Better still, it focused entirely on the use of
espionage in the war, by both sides. And really, what could be more fun
than that? 😉
Rose
doesn’t follow a strict chronology in this–he follows stories, usually
about the particular people, and uses those to take him from point to
point. Which means you know exactly where to flip back to if you need to
remind yourself about where someone was born, or who his father was,
but locating a date for a particular action of his requires the help of
the index.
doesn’t follow a strict chronology in this–he follows stories, usually
about the particular people, and uses those to take him from point to
point. Which means you know exactly where to flip back to if you need to
remind yourself about where someone was born, or who his father was,
but locating a date for a particular action of his requires the help of
the index.
The
writing of this book was never dry and at times downright witty. I
actually chuckled at several places. And at several others I found it
necessary to interrupt my reading to share a particularly interesting
factoid with my hubby. Mr. Rose found many ways to integrate
little-known facts from the day that only had the smallest thing to do
with the main subject; and he integrated them in such a way that you
knew without doubt he had submersed himself fully in this era as he
wrote the book. Something I, as I writer, certainly appreciate.
writing of this book was never dry and at times downright witty. I
actually chuckled at several places. And at several others I found it
necessary to interrupt my reading to share a particularly interesting
factoid with my hubby. Mr. Rose found many ways to integrate
little-known facts from the day that only had the smallest thing to do
with the main subject; and he integrated them in such a way that you
knew without doubt he had submersed himself fully in this era as he
wrote the book. Something I, as I writer, certainly appreciate.
I
did find a few typos in the dates given, like saying something happened
in 1778 that happened in 1780. Typos which I understand, but which
confused me endlessly, LOL.
did find a few typos in the dates given, like saying something happened
in 1778 that happened in 1780. Typos which I understand, but which
confused me endlessly, LOL.
Overall,
if you’re a history buff who loves reading about lesser-known portions
of well-loved times, this is a fabulous book. It presents a fair, honest
picture of what life was like from 1776-1784, not embellished by
glamorous ideas or romance.
if you’re a history buff who loves reading about lesser-known portions
of well-loved times, this is a fabulous book. It presents a fair, honest
picture of what life was like from 1776-1784, not embellished by
glamorous ideas or romance.
But no worries–I plan to embellish with plenty of romance when I write a novel set in the time. 😉
Roseanna M. White is a bestselling, Christy Award winning author who has long claimed that words are the air she breathes. When not writing fiction, she’s homeschooling her two kids, editing, designing book covers, and pretending her house will clean itself. Roseanna is the author of a slew of historical novels that span several continents and thousands of years. Spies and war and mayhem always seem to find their way into her books…to offset her real life, which is blessedly ordinary. 
Okay, it is still SO WEIRD (in a good way) to hear people saying they've read Ring of Secrets already. =) I'm so glad you enjoyed it, Jennifer! I have to say I'm still totally in love with this one, and praying it's well received.
Thanks so much for taking the time to stop by! Now I suppose I should go back to edits on book 2. 😉
I just finished Ring of Secrets, as I review books through NetGalley, and I have to tell you that it is amazing! I admit that I eat up Christian historical fiction because I am a big fan of pairing fiction and history to create something imaginative yet realistic. Ring of Secrets is the first book I have read of yours, and it was truly inspiring and different from most in the genre. I look forward to reading your other books and the rest of The Culper Ring series. Thank you for all of your hard work!
Cooooool 🙂