Remember When . . . The Era Changed?

Remember When . . . The Era Changed?

Last year around this same time, I was shifting gears–moving from work on Jewel of Persia to work on Love Finds You in Annapolis, Maryland. It was a pretty big shift, I grant you. Both historical, but . . . yeah, not a lot in common otherwise, and it took me a goodly while to successfully switch gears in my li’l brain.
I’ll be honest. When I dove into the 1780s, it wasn’t my favorite era. The fashions were still unfamiliar. Powdered hair, paniers, sack-backs . . . It just wasn’t what I knew. I’d written in the 1860s, the 1880s, the 1920s, but the 1780s?? What in the world had I gotten myself into?
Speech patterns were different. Vocabulary, tricky. I like to stay true to the language as much as possible without being confusing to modern readers, but so many words I use regularly weren’t around yet.
But after reading some era work, studying the era fashion and culture, I wrote. And I fell a little bit in love with the elaborate coils of hair and the wide-hipped dresses. The beautiful mannerisms and the formality of life. Enough in love that I’ve spent the summer working on another book set 1779-80. 
At this point, I’ve grown accustomed to the cadence of speech I settled on as a compromise between what it was and what modern readers will “get.” I close my eyes and see sack-back gowns and shades of hair powder. It’s comfortable, and it’s beautiful.
So naturally, it’s time to shift gears again, LOL. Back to the 1860s, of all things, though on a different continent than what I’ve written before. I’m excited to have this new project to work on, but when I sat down to write my first scene I had this moment of realization–I needed different speech patterns, different fashion.  A different setting, which means different similes. A totally different feel.
It took me a few days to wrap my brain around the changes, some reading of appropriate books, some revisiting of hoop dresses and sugary-sweet mannerisms. I’m exciting to really dive into it all, and into the history I’m going to need to draw on for this new book.
But I’m going to miss the 18th century. That century that at first befuddled and confused me, that I didn’t quite love now has a very special place in my heart. Hopefully I can revisit it someday in the near-ish future.
I’m really grateful for this opportunity that requires the shift of gears. And I’m also really grateful that when it comes down to it, I just love history. Might take me a while to really fall in love with each era for its unique features and fashions, but once I discover what sets it apart . . . ah.
Remember When . . . The Towers Came Down?

Remember When . . . The Towers Came Down?

This isn’t exactly long-past history, but as part of my 9/11 Remembrance Week, today I’d like to take a look back at where we were on that day. I’ll tell a bit of my story, and then I would love to hear from you.
My husband and I were newlyweds, having just married in June of 2001. We were still in school, and Tuesdays meant music lab–class started at 8:50 and didn’t let out until lunch time. David and I always met in the hallway outside class, walked to our car, and drove home for lunch. We had to be back for our respective work-study jobs by 1, then had one more class at the end of the day.
Annapolis traffic can be annoying, especially around on-ramps to Rt. 50. But that day as we drove up Rowe Blvd, we frowned over a rather odd sight–two unmarked, white haz-mat vans cutting through lanes of traffic and headed for the entrance to 50 West–the road that led to D.C. Shrugging it off–after all, we saw all manner of strange government vehicles in the state’s capital–we continued to our apartment.
We’d no sooner walked in the door than our phone rang. David answered as I toed off my shoes and locked the door behind us. The caller ID would have told him it was his mother, so he undoubtedly greeted her accordingly. But all I remember is him saying, “What?” and reaching for the remote. To me he said, “Planes flew into the World Trade Center. They’ve collapsed.”
It was the kind of news I’d never in my life had to deal with, and all I could think to say was, “You’re kidding, right? They didn’t collapse.” Right about then he found a channel on TV that showed one of the towers collapsing.
Presumably we ate–frankly, I don’t remember. I just remember going back into town and finding the roads clearer than usual, and the college . . . strange. See, St. John’s is a bubble removed from the outside world. There are no TVs, no cable even if you bring one. But when we stepped back onto campus that afternoon, everyone was plugged into the outside world. Televisions had miraculously appeared in every classroom, and had somehow found connections to news shows. Radios blared from every room. I remember sitting in the basement of the Admissions Office, trying to get done what work needed done, and listening to the radio. Hearing an announcement saying all non-crucial personnel at the NSA were ordered to evacuate.
That night the dinner I had planned was spaghetti with twisty breadsticks. Don’t ask me why I remember that–but it’s a meal I’ve never made again. Every time I’ve tried to make those breadsticks (with something else), I hear that terrible news reverberating through my mind again. Sorry, Pillsbury–our breadsticks now must be straight.
It was about then that I noticed our newspaper never arrived for the day–and a few minutes later I heard it smack against our door. The Capitol had delayed its printing (it’s an afternoon paper) to report the news. So I have one of (I assume) few newspapers reporting the event that is dated September 11, 2001. (I just dug it out of my memory chest, where it’s been sitting for 10 years with the other papers from that week.)

The surreal part (other than the obvious) was the transformation within Annapolis. The Naval Academy takes up the entire flank of the city, and is directly across the street from St. John’s. Most of the rest of Historic Annapolis is government buildings. On Wednesday, they were all empty. The waterfront boasted no tourists, only FBI agents. All roads leading toward the Naval Academy were blockaded by armed guards–which meant that to get onto campus, we had to show our student IDs and say we had class/work to go to.
I remember thinking as we drove to school one day that week that our whole world had changed. That things which had seemed so important a few short days before simply didn’t matter anymore. I was devastated by the events, and buoyed by the American spirit that rose up from the ashes. I remember wondering what it would mean for me as a writer–how any novel could ever have meaning again.
I remember driving home that weekend and seeing messages of faith and prayer all along the highway, “God Bless America” spelled out with plastic cups shoved in chain-link fencing.
I remember being so proud of my country, and the kinship I felt with my fellow Americans, who were, for the only time I can think of, united.
And today I miss that. I miss the union, I miss the feeling of pride that you couldn’t escape even when driving down the road. I miss looking out at my neighbors, my officials, my state and nation and thinking, “Someone did wrong to us–but we handled it right.”
Where were you on 9/11? What were you doing? What memory stands out in your recollection from that time of turmoil and grief? Let’s remember together.
Remember When . . . History Was Inconvenient?

Remember When . . . History Was Inconvenient?

For those of you who write historicals, you’re going to know exactly what I’m talking about in this post. And for anyone who doesn’t, you’re about to learn one of the things that most frustrates the historical fiction writer. 😉 It’s really kinda funny–that thing that is our best friend, that thing around which we shape our stories, can sometimes turn into our adversary.
I’m talking about those facts that just get in your way. While writing Jewel of Persia I had quite a number of them–mostly the monstrosity of the man supposed to be my hero. In my current work-in-progress, the very timeline is the problem. Okay, not a problem, but . . . well, I’m writing a story with a lot of suspense. But you know, it’s hard to sustain the suspense through 11 months of story. But that’s when things happened in history, so . . .
I mentioned this to my agent in Oregon, and she said, “Luckily, it’s fiction. You can bend things where needed.”
Well, those of us who are die-hard historical lovers don’t like to bend it too much, lest die-hard history lovers throw our books against a wall, LOL. To my agent I laughed and said, “Some of the little things that no one else knows, sure–but my next big event is the defection of Benedict Arnold. Can’t really mess with the timing of that.” (Which she readily granted, of course.)
For me, I have rules about what I’ll let myself change and what I won’t. Motivation I usually don’t mind messing with–it’s rarely recorded anyway, just speculated on. And when it is recorded, who’s to say it’s totally honest? 😉 So motivation I will change at will for the purposes of my stories.
Historical facts are a different story. Obviously the big things I’m not going to mess with. So even though it would have been much more convenient for Arnold to defect in July, it happened in late September in my book, just like it did for real. Similarly with most of the small things–if it’s recorded, I honor it. Now, with some obscure historical figures whose actions are only recorded in one source, I take some liberties when it comes to when letters are sent, etc. But only where absolutely necessary, and I try not to contradict much.
The fun, of course, comes in filling in the blanks. The frustration, of course, comes when there are blanks that you wish weren’t blanks, or times you wish it were blank and it’s not. 😉 For instance, I can’t always discover where a particular major was at a particular juncture, because the lives of majors aren’t generally recorded day by day in sources available outside private collections. I’m willing to dig to get my facts–but I’m still on a time schedule myself here, so can only dig so long. So if I have you in New York when you were in Philly, Major, I’m really sorry! 😉
I think it’s a matter of engendering trust with my readers, so I’ll work hard to stick to fact wherever I can. But there are sometimes when I really, really wish I could revise history a bit. How rude of it not to have happened exactly how I need it to for my novels! LOL
Hope everyone’s having a happy Wednesday!

Remember When . . . Marshmallows Came from a Marsh?

Well, I learned something last night. =) I was researching what candies were available in the Colonial era and come across this fun site that gave me exactly the information I needed. I clicked onto the marshmallow link and proceeded to be awed, LOL.
So apparently, marshmallows originally came from–get this–a plant called the mallow. That grew in marshes. Logical, but something I never knew. But as far back as ancient Egyptian days, folks would take the roots of the marsh mallow, boil them down, squish ’em up, and then combine them with honey. This confection was so prized that it was reserved for royalty and offerings to the gods.
The mallow plant had medicinal uses, primarily for treating wounds and alleviating hunger. Common in Europe, they began mixing the gummy root matter with white sugar and an egg white for fluff, boiling it until it thickened, and then letting it cool into something that was both medicine and confection.
In the 1850s, gum arabic began replacing the marsh mallow root, and the modern treat emerged. Featuring simple ingredients like the gum, cornstarch, egg white, and sugar, it has been largely unchanged for the last hundred fifty years. At that point they were made by hand in confectioner’s shops.
By the early 1900s they were being mass-produced and were considered a treat for children., sold as penny candy Today, of course, they’re in everything from sweet potato recipes to Jell-O salads to campfire favorites. =)
So there you go–a brief history of a treat we all probably take for granted, but which has its roots (pun intended) in ancient history. Who knew? Marshmallows from a marsh. Go figure. 😉

Remember When . . . We Shopped for Discounts?

I admit it–I have shopping on the brain. For the first time in six months, I’m actually going shopping. As in, look around, not just go in for one thing in particular. With my mom and mom-in-law. And my kids. All morning. Can’t wait. =)
So the other day when I was reading through my current work-in-progress and came across a fun factoid about 18th century shopping, it jumped out at me. And I thought, “Hey, I’ve yet to tell them about vendues!”
Ever hear of these? I hadn’t, until reading Washington’s Spies by Alexander Rose. One of the historical figures he talks about (and who also appears in my book) apprenticed in a store called Templeton & Stewart in the City of New York. T&S had two divisions–an upscale one in the fashionable district of the city, and then a vendue across from the city’s red light district, Holy Ground. 
I would have scratched my head upon reading that, had Mr. Rose not gone on to explain what this “vendue” thing was, LOL. Apparently it’s much like a discount store today. When there was either overstock or damaged goods in a regular store, they would send it to a vendue, where the goods were either auctioned off or marked down.
Apparently there was some grumbling when Templeton & Stewart opened a vendue, from owners of other retailers. But they were soon happy to see that it didn’t detract from their clientele–that two different sets of people shopped in these two different kinds of stores.
I just loved learning that this whole idea is so well established. In my hometown we have a discount store that always got overstock and damaged stuff–once upon a time this meant most things had marks or holes, but if you looked hard you could find overstock. These days it’s mostly overstock, and awesome overstock at that. Which would be why I’m heading that way in an hour. So have a great day, folks! Off I go! 😉

Thoughtful About . . . Criticism

Confession time: I am not, by nature, the type to accept critique. Maybe (and I’m guess here) it has to do with the fact that back in grade school I was always the one at the top of the class. The one who was always right, who the teachers used as an example. I got accustomed to being the best. And when you think you’re the best, it’s pretty easy to ignore advice from lesser mortals. 😉
In high school, I remember when my AP English teacher was talking to us about constructive criticism. I understood the theory, obviously, but I recall thinking something like, “Yeah, but it never feels constructive. It feels like you saying you’re right and I’m wrong.” Have I mentioned I didn’t like being wrong? LOL.
When it came to my writing, I tended to do it for myself. I had eight books completed by the time I finished college, and only let close friends and family read them. There were quite a few times when I’d ask for advice about a certain aspect of the story, or on where to cut to get my word count down.
And nearly every one of those times, I’d ignore whatever advice came in. Think something along the lines of, “What do you know? This isn’t your story.” And do it my way.
I’m not sure when it happened exactly, but I finally realize that, in fact, it is the reader’s story. And so I need to write it for them, not for me. Which means I need to know what they need. What they think. What needs to be changed. And so I consider myself blessed to have critique partners and editors who offer criticism–the kind that really is constructive.
Last Tuesday afternoon, I got my second round of edits on Annapolis. The editor, in her email, called it “pristine,” and said she barely got to do her job. Naturally, this made my day. And naturally, when I opened the document, I saw that there was still some work to do. I paged through it as I was making dinner and getting ready to run out for an evening appointment, and when I saw that some of the suggestions required actual thought, my reaction was something like this: “You’re kidding me, right?”
Yep, the same reaction I’ve always had. Here’s the difference–I used to leave it at that thought. When I first joined a critique group, it would sometimes take me days to heed good advice. Now it’s the same process of acceptance on my part–but it only takes a few seconds. Sometimes part of a second. After that first, “But, but, but . . .” I go, “Yeah, I see your point. Okay.” And I get down to making it better.
Occasionally my work with other writers, many of them new to the business and still working on that first manuscript, proves that I’m not the only one with this problem with criticism. I’ve heard excuses, I’ve heard exasperation, I’ve heard outright denial that there’s a problem with their book. And I’ve thought, “If you don’t want honest advice, why did you ask me to read this??”
Then I realize they’re no different than me, and I make sure to offer my criticism along with the hammer and nails they need to incorporate it–because I don’t want to tear anyone down with my words, I want to build them up.
I know myself well enough to realize that I’ll probably always have that half-a-second argument when I get criticism. But I’m so glad that I’m to the point now where I can so quickly see the wisdom behind it. As I’m working regularly now with editors and agents, I keep thinking of the kind of author I want to be–and I don’t mean defining myself by what I write. Rather, I’m talking about being an easy author to work with. One they know they can depend on to deliver the best manuscript I can, to accept advice graciously, to work hard and quickly to give them what they ask for.
Yeah, a little pride sneaks in when an editor tells me my book is in great shape–pride quickly checked when they follow the praise with constructive criticism. But when I click “send” on a manuscript, it’s not with the thought of, “There, perfect.” these days. It’s with the hope that I gave them what they wanted. That they read through it and think, not that Roseanna is the best author ever, but that Roseanna is a great author to work with.
I have no doubt this will be an ongoing process–and I’m grateful the Lord didn’t bless me with a contract until I was to the point where I could accept all the work required for it with grace.